The fashion show began with overtones of
The next part of the show also succeeded in catching the attention and energy of the audience. Models were wheeled onto the stage, frozen into place like dolls. They were then positioned in creative poses, once again imitating
The speakers in between the fashion runs were clear and articulate, but not concise. Though each speech only ran for several minutes, the breaks in between the runs were disruptive and too dull when contrasted with the energy in the runs. Some speakers read off their note cards; others spoke in a bit of a monotone. The intention of the speeches was justified; this was not a formal fashion show, but a charity fashion show, after all. However, I feel that the pace of the show and the flow could have been maintained by clumping the speakers together into a section right before and after intermission, or by screening brief video clips that conveyed the same message to the audience with fewer words, in a more compelling way. Though the speeches were not ideally placed and practiced, they conveyed the message that this was a charity fashion show successfully.
On the other hand, the model runs were extremely engaging and left the audience enthused. They were fast-paced—leaving the audience only about thirty seconds’ worth of admiration for each outfit—and rather professional. I was thoroughly impressed by the Stanford student-models’ ability to master the “model runway walk,” maintaining a composed facial expression and hip-swinging, graceful walk. The models kept their eyes on the camera and flaunted the artwork they wore: a veil and gloves, a paint-splattered dress, a jumpsuit. There was hair-flipping and pivot-turning galore. Each model and the style of each designer was uniquely glamorous—which appeared to be the theme—and successfully impressed the audience. By the time I left, I was left with a stronger sense of fashion, respect for the models, and overall awe.
~Dominique Y.
No comments:
Post a Comment